Back to 2024 ePosters
Perceval Aortic Valve Sizing: Diameter Derived From Area Vs Perimeter
Shubham Lahan
1, Fatima Qamar
1, Adham Elmously
1, Qasim Al Abri
2, Moath S. Alfawara
1, Mohammed Chamsi-Pasha
1,
Mahesh K. Ramchandani1;
1Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA,
2National Heart Center - Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman
BACKGROUND: Use of Transcatheter aortic valve implantation - computed tomography (TAVI-CT) protocol is currently being investigated as an adjunct for selecting appropriate size for the Perceval Aortic Valve (AV). We aimed to evaluate the correlation between the diameter derived from perimeter (Dp) and diameter derived from area (Da) with the actual size of the implanted Perceval AV.
METHODS: Using a natural language processing algorithm, data were extracted from tertiary care hospital’s in-patient database on patients who underwent Perceval AV implantation for severe aortic stenosis via midline sternotomy or minimally invasive approach between June 2016 and Jan 2023. The area and perimeter of the aortic annulus were calculated using CT measurements in the 30% systole phase.
RESULTS: We report data on 112 patients with a median age of 67 (60-74) years, of which 55% were men. The majority of the patients were Caucasians (85%). Of the total, 76% of the patients underwent isolated AV replacement and 12% underwent redo surgeries. Over half of the patients had minimally invasive surgery. Mean pre-operative gradient across the AV was 45.67 ± 13.5, which decreased to 12.24 ± 7.0 mmHg post-operatively (
Table). We found that the correlation coefficient between Da and diameter of the actually implanted AV was 0.81 vs 0.76, the correlation coefficient between Dp and actual valve implanted.
CONCLUSIONS:Our findings suggest that Da more accurately correlated with the diameter of the actually implanted AV compared to Dp.
Back to 2024 ePosters