ISMICS 17 Annual Scientific Meeting, 7-10 June 2017, Rome Cavalieri, Rome, Italy
ISMICS 17 Annual Scientific Meeting, 7-10 June 2017, Rome Cavalieri, Rome, Italy
Meeting Home Final Program Past & Future Meetings

Back to 2017 Display Posters


Surgical Outcomes Of Native And Prosthetic Valve Infective Endocarditis
Chan-Young Na.
Keimyung Universitu, Daegu, Korea, Republic of.

OBJECTIVE: Infective endocarditis is a serious, life-threatening disease with significant morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the early-and-long-term postoperative outcomes of native valve and prosthetic valve infective endocarditis.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 72 patients (25 male, and 47 female, mean age=51 years, ranging from 17 to 80 years old) with proven infective native (n= 53) or prosthetic valve (n=19) endocarditis who underwent heart valve surgery between December 1999 and August 2016 by a single surgeon. Regarding 53-native vale infective endocarditis, Twenty-six patients (49%) underwent aortic (19 replacements, 5 homograft, and 1 repair and Bentall, respectively), 26 (49%) mitral (17 repairs and 9 replacements), 6(11%), tricuspid (4 repairs and 2 replacements) and 2 (4%) pulmonic (1 repair/replacement, respectively). Regarding 19 prosthetic valve infective endocarditis, redo-operation was performed from 2 months to 252 months postoperatively, ten patients (53%) underwent redo-mitral, 5 (26%) redo-aortic. 3(16%) redo- aortic and mitral, and 1(5%) redo-Bentall procedure.
RESULTS: Overall hospital mortality was 2.7%(n=2), There was no operative mortality in native valve infective endocarditis and 2 (10.5%) mortality in prosthetic valve infective endocarditis. Causes of early death were sepsis with multiple organ failure and intracranial hemorrhage, respectively. During the follow-up from 1 to 199months (mean=78 months), four (5.5%) patients were performed redo-cardiac surgery (tricuspid valve replacement and coronary bypass surgery, respectively in native valve infective endocarditis, and aortic valve repair and redo-mitral valve replacement, respectively in prosthetic valve endocarditis)
CONCLUSIONS: We report satisfactory early-and-long-term results in native and prosthetic valve infective endocarditis. However, the outcomes are worse in prosthetic valve endocarditis. Thus we recommend aggressive surgery in native valve and prosthetic valve endocarditis.


Back to 2017 Display Posters
Copyright© 2019. International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | All Rights Reserved.